2 results
Queering the Coming Race? A Utopian Historical Imperative
- from Part IV - Embodying New Worlds
-
- By De Witt Douglas Kilgore, University of Pennsylvania Press
- Edited by Wendy Gay Pearson, Wilfrid Laurier University, Veronica Hollinger, Trent University, Joan Gordon, Nassau Community College
-
- Book:
- Queer Universes
- Published by:
- Liverpool University Press
- Published online:
- 26 October 2011
- Print publication:
- 30 September 2010, pp 233-251
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Must any future order, whether on Mars or elsewhere, recapitulate a racialized heteronormativity? Can we imagine a peaceful and just society only as the outcome of a reproductive order that requires a firmly rooted hierarchy of racial and sexual identities? Are we to assume that an ideology combining white supremacy with patriarchy must serve as the limit condition of any viable future? Do the new races imagined in science fiction simply recreate the habits of dominance and submission that structure current social realities? These are my guiding questions as I consider whether it is possible to ‘queer’ the utopian subgenre of a coming race.
Over the past two centuries, science fiction has persistently asked us to imagine futures inhabited by human beings radically different from ourselves. For a literature that claims Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818) and H. G. Wells's The Time Machine (1895) as its founding documents, this persistence is determined by tradition. The task of imaging a queer futurity, therefore, requires that we confront closely held generic assumptions about human nature and destiny. From sf's utopian and dystopian roots we inherit our evolutionary speculations about the advent of a new human race. In the history of the genre race is both a corporate term including all humanity and an exclusionary rhetoric that naturalizes possessive investments in heteronormative whiteness. My interest here is in whether narratives of new human species can resist extending the political logic of this tradition.
Queering the Coming Race? A Utopian Historical Imperative
- from Part IV - Embodying New Worlds
-
- By De Witt Douglas Kilgore, University of Pennsylvania
- Edited by Wendy Gay Pearson, Veronica Hollinger, Joan Gordon
-
- Book:
- Queer Universes
- Published by:
- Liverpool University Press
- Published online:
- 09 June 2017
- Print publication:
- 01 March 2008, pp 233-251
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
1
Must any future order, whether on Mars or elsewhere, recapitulate a racialized heteronormativity? Can we imagine a peaceful and just society only as the outcome of a reproductive order that requires a firmly rooted hierarchy of racial and sexual identities? Are we to assume that an ideology combining white supremacy with patriarchy must serve as the limit condition of any viable future? Do the new races imagined in science fiction simply recreate the habits of dominance and submission that structure current social realities? These are my guiding questions as I consider whether it is possible to ‘queer’ the utopian subgenre of a coming race.
Over the past two centuries, science fiction has persistently asked us to imagine futures inhabited by human beings radically different from ourselves. For a literature that claims Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818) and H. G. Wells's The Time Machine (1895) as its founding documents, this persistence is determined by tradition. The task of imaging a queer futurity, therefore, requires that we confront closely held generic assumptions about human nature and destiny. From sf's utopian and dystopian roots we inherit our evolutionary speculations about the advent of a new human race. In the history of the genre race is both a corporate term including all humanity and an exclusionary rhetoric that naturalizes possessive investments in heteronormative whiteness. My interest here is in whether narratives of new human species can resist extending the political logic of this tradition.
I take my title from Edward Bulwer-Lytton's The Coming Race (1871), a utopian novel that distilled mid-nineteenth-century beliefs about race and gender into the conventions that subsequent sf writers have either reinforced or resisted. In the following pages I briefly account for the limitations of coming race narrative and then investigate how we can evaluate its potential for evoking a queer futurity. My particular focus is on how Kim Stanley Robinson, a celebrated contemporary practitioner, tropes the idea of a coming race in his Mars trilogy – Red Mars (1992), Green Mars (1993), and Blue Mars (1996) – as he works to show the way to a better future. I will argue that although it is not Robinson's primary intention to show us a queer future, he suggests the conditions under which it could appear.